Published and Accepted Papers
The Accounting Review (2024)
Abstract: We examine the effects of stock market access, and in particular trading hours, on retail investment performance. Using discontinuities around time zone borders, we find that plausibly exogenous decreases in waking trading hours are associated with meaningful increases in retail investors’ capital gains, as reported on tax returns for the U.S. population. Our results indicate that limiting trading hours curbs active retail trading, leading to improvements in portfolio performance. Our findings identify one negative effect of decreasing barriers to entry for retail investors in trading markets.
Figure Highlight: Density plot of EDGAR downloads geomapped by timezone. Information acquisition shifts with local social time, not just market hours (noted by red vertical lines).
Media: Matt Levine “Money Stuff”, Bloomberg Markets, Stanford GSB Insights, ValueInvestor Insights, StakeholderLabs
This project is based on my first-year summer paper.
Management Science (Accepted)
Abstract: Tax wash sale rules prohibit the recognition of capital losses when substantially identical securities are sold and immediately repurchased within short windows. This study examines whether institutional investors use ETFs to circumvent wash sale rules. Consistent with tax-motivated demand for ETFs, incumbent ETFs both create more shares and experience more trading volume upon the introduction of nearly identical ETFs, particularly when recent returns are negative. We show tax-sensitive institutions’ investment in highly correlated ETFs has proliferated in recent years, exceeding a quarter of their AUM. Furthermore, tax-sensitive institutions holding more ETFs are significantly more likely to engage in swapping nearly identical ETFs. This swapping behavior has become widespread, with tax-sensitive institutional investors swapping $417 billion of nearly identical ETFs since 2001. We estimate that tax-sensitive institutions realized more than $84 billion dollars in losses in highly correlated ETFs associated with the swapping activity since 2001.
Figure Highlight: Proportion of institutional trading volume devoted to swapping between Highly Correlated (>.99) ETFs. Tax Sensitive institutions engage in significantly more swapping as a percent of their trading activity.
Media: Matt Levine “Money Stuff”, Bloomberg Tax Insights, FinancialPlanning, AccountingToday, MSN MoneyTalks News, Association of American Universities
This project is based on my second-year summer paper.
Working Papers
Abstract: Retail investors have a growing influence in equity markets. Efforts to understand their trading behavior often consider them as a homogenous class. I examine the extent and implications of differences in trading judgments within the retail class. I identify a sophisticated subset of retail traders (the “Savvy”) and an unsophisticated subset (the “Naïve”) who trade in starkly different ways in response to the same information. The Savvy type appears to respond to and process firm disclosures, buying good news and selling bad news. The Naïve type buy bad news and sell good news. I also explore the judgments each type of retail investor makes regarding the timeliness and costliness of their trades. I find that even the subset that appears to process and understand firm disclosures fail to earn returns that exceed their transaction costs. My findings suggest generalizations about “retail investor behavior” by academics and regulators may overlook meaningful and predictable differences within this investor class.